freebanking

Free banking in California? New bill tackles access and racial equity

By Margot Roosevelt, Los Angeles Time.

Escalating overdraft charges. Minimum balances. High ATM, check-cashing and debit card fees.

Banking can be expensive, especially for low-wage workers.

A score of California lawmakers have signed on to a new bill designed to offer Golden State households free financial services, taking on the state’s powerful banks at a time when easier access to banking services could help families cope with the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.

If it passes, the California Public Banking Option Act would create BankCal, the first state government program in the nation to offer universal consumer banking, according to financial policy experts. The program would provide no-fee debit cards, direct deposits from employers and government agencies, electronic bill payment and ATM access, directly competing with private banks.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-04-06/bankcal-california-banking-bill-offer-free-services-covid-19

Read More
InterestCompounds

Interest Compounds for a California State Public Bank

By California Public Banking Alliance

Senator Mike McGuire, Chair of the Governance and Finance Committee and Senator Steven Bradford, Chair of Banking and Financial Institutions Committee at the State Public Bank hearing.

California State Senators Mike McGuire and Steven Bradford took a bold step toward establishing a state public bank on November 23, 2020 by chairing a joint hearing with the Governance and Finance, and Banking and Financial Institutions Committees. The Senators unleashed testimony from a wide range of financial professionals and community activists supporting legislation for a state public bank.

The State Public Bank’s coauthor, Assemblymember Miguel Santiago stated the urgency of financial transformation for COVID-19 recovery by emphasizing “the need to reimagine a financial system that puts the public good before profit.” His appeal for California’s financial sovereignty was reinforced by Assembly cohort, David Chiu, stating that a state public bank “â€Ķcould keep the people’s financial power in our state to ensure that we are jump-starting our state’s economic recovery, to catalyze the development of local financial institutions in their communities, providing infrastructure, capital, and support.”

Assemblymember Miguel Santiago and Assemblymember David Chiu, joint authors of the State Public Bank bill.

Three issues stood out from a myriad of speakers.

  • Wall Street banks have failed our communities, particularly people of color.
  • Taxpayers’ money needs to be used efficiently to assist those most in need by providing capital to revitalize small businesses and rebuild communities devastated by COVID-19.
  • A state public bank will counter the corrupting influence of big banks by providing investment opportunities for those doing social good: to build affordable housing; to build sustainable infrastructure; to support small business survival; to put people back to work while rebuilding our communities, especially those that are ignored by big banks.
State Treasurer Fiona Ma and Senator Maria Elena Durazo speaking at the State Public Bank hearing.

Public banking proponents gained traction with a series of well-informed presentations from public servants, entrepreneurs, community financial institutions and community groups. California State Treasurer Fiona Ma made it clear that she supports a thorough, appropriate study for the feasibility of a public bank. Henry Levy, Alameda County Treasurer and Tax Collector, noted “a lot of the county treasurers are in support of the goals of a public bank.” Senator Maria Elena Durazo spoke of the critical need for an alternative to Wall Street to address community and small business needs that the current system has failed to support. Durazo emphasized that officials should find ways to move bold ideas forward rather than dismiss them, and acknowledged “The private sector takes advantage of our funds but doesn’t reciprocate the way that it should for our communities.”

Ameya Pawar from Open Society Foundations pointed out that the government gives banks “â€Ķthe license to create money. That is what the public provides private sector banks.” Mr. Pawar offered a solution to Senator Durazo’s concern, saying “There is no reason why the public sector couldn’t also obtain a license to create money, to fill in the gaps that are created by private sector banks.”

Ameya Pawar with Open Society Foundation and Mark Herbert, Vice President of California Small Business Majority testifies in support of a California State Public Bank.

Noni Ramos from Enterprise Community Loan Fund explained how a state public bank would help Community Development Financial Institutions be more effective. “CDFIs work to bring capital to low income and underserved communities and financial resources from the public bank could be leveraged by CDFIs.” Mark Herbert, Vice President of California Small Business Majority concurred, saying public banks provide “â€Ķ the opportunity to think about, how do we get more tools and more resources and more capital to the smallest businesses?” He concluded that “â€Ķfundamentally we need to think about not just this moment — and meeting the significant needs that small business owners and our state face — but how do we build a more equitable economy in the future?”

Scores of community activists made their voices heard in public comment. Trinity Tran from the California Public Banking Alliance made it clear that a public bank will enable public funds for rebuilding and recovery. Ms. Tran reminded legislators at the hearing that while campaigning Governor Newsom committed to breaking the hold of Wall Street banks by establishing a state public bank. Jennifer Tanner, speaking on behalf of Indivisible CA: StateStrong’s over 70 groups with 40,000 members, registered strong support for a state public bank. Ben Hauck of Public Bank Long Beach, called on legislators to take bold action for public banking as a systemic solution to a broken financial system.

Members of UFCW Western States Council.

United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 770’s Political Director Nam Le spoke on behalf of 150,000 grocery and retail frontline workers. The union supports public banks capable of partnering with community banks and credit unions to lend responsibly to localities, especially communities of color, which have suffered the greatest losses in the pandemic. Steve Sittig of Public Bank Pomona Valley pointed out that a state public bank can smooth the way for setting up local and regional public banks.

Joining the overwhelming support for a state bank in the public comment section were California Reinvestment Coalition (CRC), a key ally in California Public Banking Alliance’s effort, representing over 300 California small businesses and CDFIs, and the People’s Alliance for Justice testifying on how a State Public Bank will be able to support CDFIs in their work with the unbanked, leveling the playing field for our most needy.

Richard Girling of United Educators of San Francisco and SF Public Bank Coalition urged legislators to look to Germany’s Sparkassen, a network of hundreds of public banks that have operated for a couple hundred years. Rose Anwich from Ventura County expressed her concern that Wall Street banks continue to finance extractive industries and that public banks are needed for financing climate resilient initiatives. Bonnie Petty, from North Bay Jobs with Justice, noted that had there been a state public bank, recovery funds could have been leveraged to provide much more relief from the fires that destroyed communities.

In a recent newsletter by the Public Banking Act’s co-author Asm. Phil Ting, the Legislative Analyst estimated “a one-time $26 billion windfall in revenues this coming year. However, deficits are projected for several years thereafter. In addition, COVID-19 cases are surging, potentially exacerbating our economic challenges and the number of vulnerable Californians in need of assistance.” Using some of this windfall as the foundation for a state public bank in 2021 will be critical in enabling California to leverage funds in future years to assist in rebuilding and restructuring our local economies.

The California Public Banking Alliance (CPBA) is a coalition of public banking activists in California working to create socially and environmentally responsible city and regional public banks.

Read our article on Medium.

Read More
cpba bank

Public Banking Act Gives Us A Proven Model to Address Unprecedented Crises

By California Public Banking Alliance

America faces a perfect storm of ever-escalating crises which are culminating in a central crisis of democracy itself. We are wholly unprepared for this crisis, because our institutions are failing. From the justice system to the Presidency to Wall Street, Americans are wondering what actually works, and who led us to this situation in the first place. How can we repair the shell-shocked economy and reverse climate change, when politicians and their wealthy donors are steadfast to resist all change that would threaten their bottom lines, even if it ensures the end of life on Earth?

Under their watch, the economic and environmental precarities of working people have mounted for generations, and Black people and immigrants have been shunted to the side of prosperity, health and safety. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought extreme inequality and its deleterious effects on our nation’s social fabric into sharp relief. Renters face mass evictions, small businesses have closed forever, and governments at all levels face huge budget shortfalls that threaten basic services. People who have borne the brunt of inequality for centuries now see their situations getting even worse, and they see police ready to inflict violence to terrorize them into accepting that inequality.

The backdrop of this social turmoil is a global ecosystem incurring irreversible damage threatening homes, global security, and the supply of food and clean water for billions of people, including hundreds of millions in the United States. As fires rage on the West Coast and waters rise in Louisiana and elsewhere, the cost of inaction mounts daily. Meanwhile, millions of Americans are unable to work because the danger of infection is too great or because their jobs no longer exist, while others are forced to work in dangerous situations to maintain basic living standards in the richest country on Earth.

The measures taken to mitigate the impact of these crises on working Americans have failed, but you wouldn’t know it from the mood on Wall Street. Markets continue to forecast rosy days ahead for investors, despite record drops in GDP, employment, and consumer spending. The public health response to the virus has brave and diligent nurses and doctors pleading for resources and coordination from central authorities, who choose instead to pander to markets with promises of a quick reopening. The Federal Reserve has taken extraordinary steps to shore up commercial debt and capital markets, amounting to a massive payday for the richest people in the world. America’s cities, which are blameless in the scope and impact of this catastrophe, face multibillion dollar deficits, school closures, and even bankruptcy, threatening the pay and medical benefits of teachers, firefighters, and sanitation workers. This callousness towards the needs of cities stands in sharp contrast to the swift and active protection received by Wall Street both in 2008, when financial market actors engineered the global collapse, and in 2020, when they show no interest in providing for anyone other than themselves.

The minimal assistance the Fed has extended to the people and their local governments has utterly failed to address this unprecedented economic shock, and has mostly exacerbated the structural inequalities built into our nation’s financial system. The Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF) was supposed to help state and local governments, but city and state treasurers are in agreement that its terms are onerous and render the effort useless, which is why it has only been tapped twice during the entire pandemic, once with significantly renegotiated terms.

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a forgivable loan program meant to keep people employed and businesses afloat, was mainly eaten up by big, well-connected businesses. The President’s son-in-law was able to borrow millions for his businesses. The National Community Reinvestment Coalition found that lenders discouraged Black borrowers from applying for a loan while encouraging white borrowers to apply for multiple loans. As a result of the historic and long-standing structural barriers to capital for Black and Brown small business owners, only 2% of PPP loans went to Black-owned small businesses and only 6% went to Latinx small businesses. Rather than ensure that workers, small businesses, and school and public health systems are able to withstand this storm, Wall Street and their friends in the Trump administration have made cheap credit available to multi-billion dollar private companies while leaving the rest of us, especially Black people and other marginalized groups, in the rain.

The tools at our disposal today are inadequate to solve our current crises. Efforts to confront the issues head-on, like the ones which make up the Green New Deal, cannot and should not rely on private banks and existing federal programs. Decades of “green” investment, recycling, carbon offsets and luxury electric cars have not slowed the melting of the ice caps or the rising of the seas. Health insurance companies and private hospital chains are not in the business of solving our comorbid healthcare crises of rampant debt, lack of access, and drastically unequal outcomes. Private banks and investors have neither the incentives nor the desire to tackle these issues, nor should we permit them to syphon profit from the massive public investments necessary to effectively deal with them. Instead, Congress and governments at every level must establish new forms of investment for the common good, including public banks, to serve as an alternative to the private financial system, to make these solutions a reality.

The public needs an alternative to Wall Street. As momentum grows in dozens of cities and states across the US to pass public banking legislation, we endorse the Public Banking Act introduced by Representatives Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez. The bill enables the creation of public banks with direct access to the Federal Reserve, creates a pathway for state-chartered banks to gain federal recognition, and recognizes a framework for public banks to interact with Fed Accounts and Digital Dollar platforms. Only the establishment of public investment and banking accountable to the common good will give cities, states and federal agencies the tools we need to solve these crises.

Public banks, defined as banks entirely owned by cities, counties, public districts or states and controlled by the people who live in them, can help ensure credit is made available for local renewable energy and other green businesses, climate-resilient infrastructure, public and affordable housing, education, rehabilitation, and low-cost loans to job-creating entrepreneurs, especially to marginalized communities and worker-owned businesses. Chartering banks to invest public capital in these projects will not completely solve these crises. We need a financial system that prioritizes the livability of our planet and the equality demanded by a free people. We need banks that are answerable to the people, and accountable to standards of sustainable and restorative investment.

Public banks are a proven tool and are essential to a revitalized public financial system. There are over 700 public banks worldwide investing $37.7 trillion, which accounts for 15% of all global assets. Germany’s robust Sparkassen network of over 400 public banks have functioned as the engine of the country’s infrastructure development, providing 72% of all financing for that country’s world-leading renewable energy infrastructure. Wherever they operate, public banks provide a vehicle for economic recovery and resilience by harnessing public credit and financial services to invest directly into local communities, small businesses, and municipal governments.

Public banks complement postal banking and other approaches to democratize the Federal Reserve. Under Tlaib’s bill, public banks in state and cities could seamlessly integrate with FedAccounts, a new proposal that would give Americans easy access to payment services without relying on for profit banks and the risks they pose to deposits. Postal banks could work with public investment banks in counties to reinvest savings accounts into new school construction, paying millions of workers the interest payments instead of a handful of institutional investors. These are not financial innovations, quite the contrary, they are quite common throughout the world, with one special example in the United States.

Domestically, the Bank of North Dakota has operated for over a century and weathered every financial crisis while improving the state’s financial position. In partnership with community banks, BND rolled out the most accessible implementation of PPP and its two successor programs in the country, while deferring all $1.1 billion of its student loans until after the crisis.

We need more publicly-obligated capital sources devoted to economic recovery and reinvention to meet challenges ahead. Public bank efforts in California, New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, and many other states follow the model of existing public banks such as BND and Sparkassen. These banks will facilitate critical investment, largely through partnerships with local community banks and credit unions to provide low-interest loans for small businesses, affordable housing, infrastructure, and other sectors to serve the public good.

Perhaps even more impactful is how public banks will extend access to basic money and financial services for everyday Americans. Private banks have long perpetuated racial and economic inequality by systematically denying basic financial services to Black people and immigrants. In Miami, Detroit, Laredo, TX and the Bronx over 20% of residents do not have bank accounts. In areas of Cleveland, Nashville and Atlanta that number is as high as 40%. Unfettered access to the fruits of one’s own labor is a human right. In 2020, US wages are paid in US dollars which must be deposited into banks, so those of us deemed “unprofitable” have few alternatives. Check cashing services, overdraft fees, and high interest payday loans exact a high cost for being poor, to the benefit privately-owned banks and largely unregulated “shadow banks.” Public banks can offer free and low-cost services universally giving access to check cashing, bank accounts and basic credit services so that everyone can participate in the economy, cash our paychecks, and feed our families.

These are the practical reasons for public banks, but we also have a moral duty to divest from exploitative and extractive systems bound up with private finance. Private financial institutions consider the banking power theirs and theirs alone, and our government has agreed with them, until now. Their opposition to public banking is well documented and rooted in self preservation, not financial prudence. But a banking charter is an instrument of the public trust, and in America governments franchised that power entirely to an unaccountable class of shareholders and lobbyists, to the detriment of working people around the world.

Building an intergenerational foundation for a more just and equitable financial system will proceed faster and more smoothly with a network of publicly owned banks at the municipal and state level. Without this network in place to direct and capture gains from stimulus spending, the recovery could be marked by a decade or more of austerity, with public budgets servicing guaranteed debt to far-flung investors with huge portfolios, but no stake in our communities.

Let’s not repeat the same mistake we made in the last financial crisis. We can transform the foundation of our financial system and place its power in the hands of the people. We can make urgent investments in the recovery, a just economy and a habitable world, and we can create banks and financial infrastructure accountable to those goals. We need public banks now.

Read More

Tlaib, Ocasio-Cortez Introduce Legislation Enabling Creation of Public Banks

Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib (MI-13) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) introduced the historic Public Banking Act, which allows for the creation of state and locally administered public banks by establishing the Public Bank Grant program administered by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board which would provide grants for the formation, chartering and capitalization of public banks. 29 organizations that have long advocated for the public banking system it would make possible also support the legislation, including the California Public Banking Alliance (CBPA).

Read Congresswoman Tlaib’s press release: https://tlaib.house.gov/tlaib-aoc-public-banking-act.

Read More

Public banks are officially law in California! Read our latest press on AB 857!

Read More

California State Public Bank Bill AB 310 Moves Forward in 2021

By Brett Garrett, Rick Girling, Susan Harman, Debbie Notkin, Trinity Tran

Public banking took a gigantic step forward on Monday as the Senate Governance and Finance Committee under Chair Senator Mike McGuire heard informational testimony for AB 310, which will establish the California state public bank to address the catastrophic economic consequences of COVID-19. This historic hearing confirmed that Treasurer Fiona Ma and Controller Betty Yee will work closely with the California Public Banking Alliance (CPBA) and legislative authors Assemblymembers Miguel Santiago (D-L.A.) and David Chiu (D-S.F.) in the coming months. With their support, the bill is likely to be passed and signed into law during the next legislative session in 2021.

While abbreviated legislative sessions resulting from the pandemic postponed a vote on AB 310 until the next session, the support of the Treasurer, the Controller, and the chair of the Senate Governance and Finance Committee has given public banking advocates and financial experts a chance to refine the proposal to grow its support, popularity and efficacy, and see it passed and signed into law next year.

Assemblymember Miguel Santiago testifies in support of AB 310 in the Senate Governance and Finance Committee.

“AB 310 is about shifting power away from big Wall Street banks and back into the hands of our real shareholders; the taxpayers,” said Assemblymember Santiago. “As we deal with the ghastly economic crash from the pandemic, we simply do not need to be suckered into the predatory banking practices of Wall Street. The state bank is a direct, efficient, fast way to give small businesses, local governments and the people of California financial peace and justice.”

“We made history together with AB 857 last year, which made our state the first in 100 years to allow locally-chartered public banks. A state public bank builds on this progress and makes an overdue investment in our financial infrastructure to promote the social good. I look forward to revisiting this conversation next year and continuing to ensure that the public’s money works for the people,” said Assemblymember Chiu.

Assemblymember David Chiu testifies in support of AB 310 in the Senate Governance and Finance Committee.

In a letter to Chair McGuire, Ma commended the AB 310 authors “for trying to address the economic impacts due to Covid-19 as well as supporting historically marginalized communities across California” and said that she looks “forward to working with the advocates over the next 6 months on coming up with a workable solution.”

Within a few weeks of the bill’s introduction, AB 310 garnered unprecedented support from over 80 organizations and 220 delegates of the California Democratic Party, including endorsements from United Food and Commercial Workers Western States Council, SEIU California, and Los Angeles County Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO. Union President John Grant made clear labor support for the legislation. “On behalf of the over 30,000 members of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 770, we strongly support the creation of a public bank for the State of California. In this moment of crisis, grocery, retail drug and packing house workers are struggling in very basic ways as essential employees. If nothing else, the global pandemic gives us the opportunity to rethink equity and how we best respond to a likely imminent global recession. A public bank is a necessary part of the overall recovery.”

Public banking proponents Sushil Jacob from the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of SF and Paulina Gonzalez-Brito of California Reinvestment Coalition presented powerful arguments for a state bank. They reminded everyone that communities of color have been the first and hardest-hit victims of the economic crisis with 42% of African-American-owned small businesses shuttered compared to 17% of white-owned businesses. Access to capital is vital to rural and urban municipalities that have been robbed of tax revenue due to business closings and record unemployment. AB 310 reimagines banking by providing California with an alternative to Wall Street banks, keeping funds in the state rather than siphoning money to out-of-state actors. Under AB 310, funds in the state coffers will be efficiently utilized for reinvesting and rebuilding devastated communities, leading to a vibrant and sustainable recovery from COVID-19.

The state bank will provide a counter to the global banks that have mishandled and profited substantially from funds allocated to address the current financial crisis. Wall Street banks gave priority to large corporations in distributing Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) funds, leaving little or nothing for struggling small businesses. The Federal Reserve Bank handed out billions to the largest banks at near-zero interest with no strings attached while making municipalities beg for funds at above-market rates with onerous constraints. As Jacob explained, AB 310 is a better way. “We can invest our state and local dollars in job creating, income producing and climate-change adapting projects. That is the promise of AB 310.”

AB 310 coalition members speak with California Treasurer Fiona Ma.

Public banking has a long history in growth-oriented economies such as Germany’s, as well as our own home-grown public Bank of North Dakota celebrating 100 years of successful operation. These are times that require new approaches, and fortunately Treasurer Ma and Controller Yee together with Senator McGuire are contributing their expertise to a collaboration with public banking advocates, California labor, and other stakeholders to find the right solutions for ensuring that California’s money does the most it can to help Californians.

The desperately needed California state public bank will allow us to thrive again sooner, setting the pace for the nation.

The California Public Banking Alliance (CPBA) is a coalition of public banking activists in California working to create socially and environmentally responsible city and regional public banks.

Read our article on Medium.

Read More

Public banking would help speed the economic recovery from COVID-19

April 17, 2020 – The Hill. Rick Girling of the California Public Banking Alliance and Isaiah Poole with Next System Project lays out the case for why public banks are a necessary engine for economic recovery.

At least 90 percent of the nation’s cities are facing a budget crisis because of the economic shutdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a mid-April report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the National League of Cities. Because municipal governments cannot run deficits, they will have to respond by cutting staff and programs, which will worsen the economic conditions of the cities they serve.

If cities had public banks, they would be much better equipped to deal with these budget shortfalls and maintain the services and staff most vital to their economic recovery. That’s why state and local political leaders should use emergency powers to rapidly create public banks that can serve as key engines of a just and sustainable economic recovery.

Public banks are new to most of us in America, but they have been a proven institution globally for the past few hundred years. The one place in America where public banking is not new is North Dakota, where the 100-year-old Bank of North Dakota is widely credited with helping the state’s economy weather the 2008 recession far better than other states. 

In 2019, the California Public Banking Alliance ushered through the California legislature historic legislation, AB 857, The Public Banking Act. This law for the first time allows municipalities across the state to set up public banks in their communities. An increasing number of states and localities are considering following California’s lead.

A public bank, capitalized with the deposits that cities now park in Wall Street banks, will be a ready source of funds to help people and businesses sustain themselves through these hard times and rebuild. Public banks, like all banks, are able to multiply the impact of their capital by leveraging it up to ten times in loans. They provide the most efficient means for expeditiously deploying funds quickly to help recovery efforts, such as the low-interest loans to small- and medium-sized businesses to help them get back on their feet. 

Public banking would help speed the economic recovery from COVID-19

ÂĐ Getty Images

At least 90 percent of the nation’s cities are facing a budget crisis because of the economic shutdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a mid-April report by the U.S. Conference of Mayors and the National League of Cities. Because municipal governments cannot run deficits, they will have to respond by cutting staff and programs, which will worsen the economic conditions of the cities they serve.

If cities had public banks, they would be much better equipped to deal with these budget shortfalls and maintain the services and staff most vital to their economic recovery. That’s why state and local political leaders should use emergency powers to rapidly create public banks that can serve as key engines of a just and sustainable economic recovery.

Public banks are new to most of us in America, but they have been a proven institution globally for the past few hundred years. The one place in America where public banking is not new is North Dakota, where the 100-year-old Bank of North Dakota is widely credited with helping the state’s economy weather the 2008 recession far better than other states. 

In 2019, the California Public Banking Alliance ushered through the California legislature historic legislation, AB 857, The Public Banking Act. This law for the first time allows municipalities across the state to set up public banks in their communities. An increasing number of states and localities are considering following California’s lead.

A public bank, capitalized with the deposits that cities now park in Wall Street banks, will be a ready source of funds to help people and businesses sustain themselves through these hard times and rebuild. Public banks, like all banks, are able to multiply the impact of their capital by leveraging it up to ten times in loans. They provide the most efficient means for expeditiously deploying funds quickly to help recovery efforts, such as the low-interest loans to small- and medium-sized businesses to help them get back on their feet. 

Imagine the difference it will make when a network of public banks exists to partner with the Small Business Administration to help execute the Paycheck Protection Program authorized by Congress. Instead of small businesses being frustrated trying to work with the commercial banks to obtain the loans, and having no place to turn when the agency announced the program ran out of funds on April 16, public banks would be there to stand in the gap. 

Continue reading on The Hill.

Read More
whatapublicbank

What a Public Bank Can Do for Real People

Oscar Perry Abello talks with Sylvia Chi and Kurtis Wu from the California Public Banking Alliance. YES! Magazine takes a deep dive into the Bank of North Dakota, the only state-owned bank in the nation and explores how public funds can be redirected to empower local communities.

The little city of Hazen, North Dakota, population 2,300, is the kind of town where farming and ranching families often have a second income from a job at a power plant or a coal mine.

As a teenager, Christie Obenauer, nÃĐe Huber, frequently made the hourlong drive from Hazen to Bismarck, the state capital, to go shopping with her sister. On the way, they’d usually make a stop to run an errand for their dad, who ran Union State Bank of Hazen.

“We would back up that giant Buick to the back of the old Bank of North Dakota building, they loaded it up with money, and we’d cover it up with a blanket, close the trunk, go to the mall, and come home,” Obenauer says. “That was a different time. Everyone just knew we were the Huber girls.”

Obenauer is the fourth generation in her family to run Union State Bank. Founded in 1908, the bank today holds $130 million in deposits and has $147 million in loans, investments, and other assets. Obenauer still sends her staff on regular trips to pick up coin and currency in Bismarck—just don’t ask her what car they drive.

Though it’s a tiny institution in a tiny city, Union State is able to do many things normally beyond the reach of a bank of its size. It served as the lead local lender for a $30.5 million medical center that opened in 2016, combining state and federal loans, another federal loan guarantee, and cash from the regional health system. Obenauer describes how her bank partnered with the medical center, Basin Electric, and a few other local employers to convert a former church into a cooperatively owned child care center that now serves 88 kids. She also notes that her bank helped finance manufactured housing for new workers attracted by the shale oil boom. The Bank of North Dakota was an instrumental secondary market to buy those mortgages, taking up the long-term risk in the way Fannie Mae helps local lenders across the country.

While there is certainly a lot that’s unique about Hazen, Union State Bank, and Obenauer’s path to becoming a fourth-generation community banker, it is not unusual in North Dakota to find a little bank punching far above its weight. That’s just how banking works in this state, largely because of the century-old Bank of North Dakota, the only state-owned bank in the country.

All of North Dakota’s state tax and fee revenues get deposited by default into the Bank of North Dakota. Prohibited by law from competing with the private sector, it has no branches or ATMs, and other than student loans, the bank rarely originates or services loans directly to people or businesses. If you want to open an account and deposit your own money into the bank, you have to go in person to the main office in Bismarck, and you also have to be a North Dakota resident.

The Bank of North Dakota operates primarily as a bankers’ bank, partnering with local financial institutions to leverage the state’s deposits in ways designed to strengthen local banks and credit unions.

Continue reading in Yes Magazine.

Read More
statelegislation

State legislation prompts San Diego to explore creating a city-owned ‘public bank’

San Diego Union-Tribune – February 2, 2020. The San Diego Union-Tribune talks with Jeff Olson with Public Bank SD and the California Public Banking Alliance on the next steps for a San Diego Public Bank.

SAN DIEGO â€”  New state legislation allowing cities to establish government-run “public banks” has prompted San Diego officials to begin exploring the idea, including four City Council members who want to spend $250,000 on a feasibility study.

San Diego would join Los Angeles, Oakland and several other cities that have begun analyzing the pros and cons of public banks, which aim to boost city revenue and direct more capital to priorities like affordable housing.

If approved, San Diego would launch its public bank, which could happen as soon as next year, using hundreds of millions of dollars from city reserves that it now keeps at Bank of America.

By cutting out a commercial bank as the middle man, the city could replace the small interest payments it receives from B of A — currently about 1 percent — with interest revenue as high as 20 percent from loans it would make, supporters say.

Continue reading on The San Diego Union-Tribune.

Read More
voicesofcalifornia

Voices of the California Progressive Alliance

SF Bay View – January 17, 2020. About 500 people gathered in the Pauley Ballroom on the University of California-Berkeley’s campus for the second annual meeting of the California Progressive Alliance (CPA) on Jan. 12. Trinity Tran of the California Public Banking Alliance spoke to Diana Cabcabin:

“Public banking is an idea that we introduced into the California State Legislature in 2019. It took a considerable amount of work to build political capital behind this bill and move the public banking conversation into the political mainstream. We are not the first organization to pass a state public banking bill [AB 857], but what we accomplished was extraordinary.

“This was a high profile and controversial bill facing heavy opposition from nine big financial firms but, without any corporate funding, we coordinated strategy with activists and supporters from across the state and got it passed. We built an endorsement list of 200 statewide regional and community organizations, including national organizations like Our Revolution and national figures like Sen. Bernie Sanders, who backs this bill.”

Continue reading on SF Bay View.

Read More