assemblyvotes

Assembly Votes To Guarantee All Californians Free Basic Banking Services

Sacramento, CA – Today, the California State Assembly approved landmark legislation that would guarantee all Californians access to basic banking services without fees or penalties. The California Public Banking Option Act, AB 1177 (BankCal), addresses the inequities in financial services acutely felt by communities that have been hardest hit by pandemic and recession: discrimination, predatory lending, and vicious spirals of debt. AB 1177 is endorsed by SEIU California, California Reinvestment Coalition, California Public Banking Alliance, and 200 racial and economic justice groups, faith-based and climate justice organizations, businesses, and labor unions.

“Struggling families are hit by fee after fee at every corner, and BankCal will help them keep their hard-earned dollars for food and rent,” said Assemblymember Miguel Santiago, lead author of AB 1177. “Providing a public banking option for essential financial services will help close the racial wealth gap. AB 1177 is a key tool to social and economic mobility, and I’m excited to continue pushing to pass this bill in the Senate.”

“We applaud the Assembly for supporting this bill and ensuring access to financial services for all Californians regardless of how much money they make, their zip code, or the color of their skin,” said Bob Schoonover, SEIU California President and SEIU 721 Executive Director. “Limited access to basic banking services like check cashing are a problem that disproportionately impacts low-income communities and communities of color. BankCal is a concrete step in making sure that everyone has the opportunity to recover and come back stronger from the devastation caused by the pandemic.”

Seventy-eight percent of unbanked households make less than $30,000 annually and 42% make less than $15,000 annually. Nearly half of all Black-identifying households and Hispanic-identifying households in California are unbanked or underbanked.

“Today’s vote advancing BankCal, moves the state closer to being on the right side of history,” said Paulina Gonzalez-Brito, Executive Director of the California Reinvestment Coalition. “AB1177 carries with it the potential to finally build an alternative to the extractive and exclusive Wall Street banking system that has failed historically low-income communities and Black, Indigenous, People of Color. A banking system that centers people instead of profits is a start toward addressing long-standing racial and economic inequities in the state.”

“Today’s Assembly vote in support of BankCal affirms that banking services are essential in allowing full participation in our economy–it is a necessity, not a luxury,” said Trinity Tran, lead organizer of the California Public Banking Alliance. “The Assembly’s passage of AB 1177 comes at a critical moment for struggling Californians and advances the movement toward a more equitable banking system.”

AB 1177 is modeled from the success of CalSavers and CalKids, similar programs aimed at creating greater financial stability for working families. To study the most effective and efficient way to operate the BankCal program, AB 1177 requires a market analysis. Upon completion of the market analysis and approval by the Legislature, AB 1177 establishes the BankCal program.

The BankCal program would allow Californians to create a BankCal account, use a BankCal debit card, deposit funds, automate bill pay, and set up direct deposit without fees or penalties.

https://calreinvest.org/press-release/assembly-votes-to-guarantee-all-californians-free-basic-banking-services/

Read More
losangelescity

Los Angeles City Council Unanimously Supports Statewide Public Banking Option

KCET- LOS ANGELES (CNS) – June 1, 2021 The Los Angeles City Council today voiced its support for creating a statewide public banking option for California residents in an attempt to reduce racial and income inequalities in financial services.

“There’s no question that there’s a need for a public bank. The simple fact is that the current banking system has never truly worked for working people and specifically for communities of color,” said Councilman Kevin de Leon, who introduced a resolution to support the California Public Banking Option Act currently pending in the state Assembly. The resolution was unanimously passed by City Council members.

“The public banking option will level the playing field so that everyone — no matter how much money they make, the color of their skin, or which zip code they live in — can fully participate in our economic recovery.”

The California Public Banking Option Act would create the BankCal program, which would be the first statewide program in the U.S. to offer residents access to a no-fee, no-penalty bank account, including a debit card, automatic bill pay, direct deposit capacity and an infrastructure for the account holder to build credit. The bill was co-authored and introduced by Assemblyman Miguel Santiago, D-Los Angeles.

According to the resolution, which was introduced by de Leon and Councilman Curren Price, a quarter of California residents are “unbanked” or “underbanked,” and rely heavily on payday lenders, prepaid cards and pawn shops, causing them to proportionally pay more for their financial services, lack savings accounts and opportunities to build credit and face an increased rate of loan rejection.

The problem disproportionately affects low-income people and communities of color, and nearly half of Black and Latino households in California are unbanked or underbanked, according to the resolution, which used information from a survey conducted by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

“Providing banking services to the unbanked and underbanked is too expensive for community banks, credit unions and (Community Development Financial Institutions) to do efficiently,” stated the resolution, which was seconded by Councilwoman Nithya Raman.

The California Public Banking Option Act “would close the financial services divide, bolster the economy and ensure an equitable recovery by creating a stable, accessible financial services platform with the BankCal program,” according to the resolution, which added that it would “reduce Californians’ risk of falling into catastrophic debt traps and bring us closer to bridging the racial wealth gap.”

The Assembly bill would create a nine-member Public Banking Option Act that would design and implement the BankCal program. The board would select existing financial institutions to partner with and manage and coordinate the vendors for the program.

Ben Gordon, an organizer with Public Bank L.A. and the California Public Bank Alliance, called into the City Council meeting Tuesday to urge council members to approve the resolution. “This bill is an important step forward to bridge the racial equity and wealth gap in our state,” he said.

https://www.kcet.org/news-community/los-angeles-city-council-unanimously-supports-statewide-public-banking-option

Read More
bankpenalities

A Bank Without Penalties And Fees? An Assembly Bill Aims To Help Low-Income Californians

LAist – Millions of low-income Californians might be able to bank free of penalties and fees if state lawmakers approve the latest attempt to create public banking.

AB 1177 would form a state-supported public bank board, which would partner with private banks to offer the free accounts. The program would be called “BankCal.”

“If a rich person earns money, that money makes money,” said State Assemblymember Miguel Santiago (D-LA), the bill’s author. “When a poor person earns money, that money is gouged from every corner you could possibly get it. You get gouged when you go to payday lendings, you get gouged at the banks. You get gouged on every transaction and every fee.”

The California Public Banking Alliance sponsored the measure. Co-founder Trinity Tran said the bill would help bridge the racial wealth in underserved communities:

“Because when poor folks have to pay for their financial services, that means they have fewer opportunities to grow credit, they’re rejected for loans, and that all amounts to a real disadvantage for millions of families.”

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill in 2019 to allow independent municipalities to create their own public banks, but this would create a state-backed banking system.

Correction: A previous version of this article stated that previous California bills allowing public banking option failed. Actually, Newsom signed a bill years ago to allow independent municipalities to create their own public banks.

https://laist.com/news/banking-without-penalties-fees-ab117

Read More

Santa Barbara County Interested in Studying Feasibility of Central Coast Public Bank

Noozhawk – May 29, 2021

The Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors passed a resolution this month expressing interest in participating in a viability study that would determine the feasibility of establishing a public bank with the five Central Coast counties.

“At least studying this as a possibility is a responsible decision in light of the hedging of risk and diversification as a way to minimize risk and at least have the possibility or returns,” First District Supervisor Das Williams said at the May 4 meeting. “I think it would be a responsible decision to analyze that, to analyze the possible benefit for the taxpayer and for the county. And if there is no benefit, then you don’t move forward.”

California Assembly Bill 857 created a process for local agencies to create a public bank, which is defined as a corporation organized for the purpose of engaging in the commercial or industrial banking business that is owned wholly by a local agency, local agencies or a joint powers authority, according to a letter filed to the board.

Before forming the bank, the bill requires the local agency to conduct a study to assess its viability.

Santa Cruz County Supervisor Zach Friend sent a letter requesting statements of interest in participating in the study to the five Central Coast counties: Santa Cruz, Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara.

The study must include a discussion of the purposes of the bank, including achieving cost savings, strengthening local economies, supporting community development, and addressing infrastructure and housing needs for localities.

A fiscal analysis of costs associated with starting the bank and financial projections for the first five years of the proposed bank also must be included in the study. The financial projections should include an estimate of the time period for when expected revenues meet or exceed the expected costs and an estimate of the total operating subsidy that the agency may be required to provide until the proposed bank generates sufficient revenue to cover its costs, according to the board letter.

The study also must include an analysis of how the proposed governance structure of the public bank separates from unlawful insider transactions and apparent conflicts of interest.

The majority of board members were interested in participating in the study and thought the proposed bank offers an opportunity to reinvest money locally, reduce taxes or provide a major new source of income.

“This offers an opportunity to reinvest money that we are already collecting in taxpayer revenue and invest it locally,” Third District Supervisor Joan Hartmann said. “My real interest in this is that it could reduce the cost of public infrastructure projects by 35 to 50%.”

Williams said that a huge position of advantage would be if cannabis was part of the study’s analysis because the bank’s lending opportunities are fewer.

“I would imagine that there is at least a possibility of a competitive advantage on a public bank that is really looking to financing, borrowing or investing via that industry simply because we would not be shackled by the same federal prohibitions that most lending institutions have,” he said.

https://www.noozhawk.com/article/county_interested_in_study_discussing_feasibility_of_a_central_coast_public

Read More

Monterey County officials show interest in public banking

Monterey Herald –

SALINAS — Monterey County elected officials have OK’d exploring the concept of joining other Central Coast counties to develop a public banking system that would provide benefits for economic development, infrastructure needs and affordable housing.

The Board of Supervisors on Tuesday gave the nod to exploring how interested Monterey County would be in joining Santa Cruz, San Benito, San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara counties in a regional public banking system called the Central Coast Public Bank.

Introduced by Supervisor Luis Alejo, the decision was exploratory only and no taxpayer dollars would be used. If enough interest is generated, the county would then debate joining partner counties in conducting a feasibility study that would cost between an estimated $100,000 to $500,000.

The Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors is taking the lead on developing funding for a viability study.

Read More
freebanking

Free banking in California? New bill tackles access and racial equity

By Margot Roosevelt, Los Angeles Time.

Escalating overdraft charges. Minimum balances. High ATM, check-cashing and debit card fees.

Banking can be expensive, especially for low-wage workers.

A score of California lawmakers have signed on to a new bill designed to offer Golden State households free financial services, taking on the state’s powerful banks at a time when easier access to banking services could help families cope with the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.

If it passes, the California Public Banking Option Act would create BankCal, the first state government program in the nation to offer universal consumer banking, according to financial policy experts. The program would provide no-fee debit cards, direct deposits from employers and government agencies, electronic bill payment and ATM access, directly competing with private banks.

https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2021-04-06/bankcal-california-banking-bill-offer-free-services-covid-19

Read More
InterestCompounds

Interest Compounds for a California State Public Bank

By California Public Banking Alliance

Senator Mike McGuire, Chair of the Governance and Finance Committee and Senator Steven Bradford, Chair of Banking and Financial Institutions Committee at the State Public Bank hearing.

California State Senators Mike McGuire and Steven Bradford took a bold step toward establishing a state public bank on November 23, 2020 by chairing a joint hearing with the Governance and Finance, and Banking and Financial Institutions Committees. The Senators unleashed testimony from a wide range of financial professionals and community activists supporting legislation for a state public bank.

The State Public Bank’s coauthor, Assemblymember Miguel Santiago stated the urgency of financial transformation for COVID-19 recovery by emphasizing “the need to reimagine a financial system that puts the public good before profit.” His appeal for California’s financial sovereignty was reinforced by Assembly cohort, David Chiu, stating that a state public bank “â€Ķcould keep the people’s financial power in our state to ensure that we are jump-starting our state’s economic recovery, to catalyze the development of local financial institutions in their communities, providing infrastructure, capital, and support.”

Assemblymember Miguel Santiago and Assemblymember David Chiu, joint authors of the State Public Bank bill.

Three issues stood out from a myriad of speakers.

  • Wall Street banks have failed our communities, particularly people of color.
  • Taxpayers’ money needs to be used efficiently to assist those most in need by providing capital to revitalize small businesses and rebuild communities devastated by COVID-19.
  • A state public bank will counter the corrupting influence of big banks by providing investment opportunities for those doing social good: to build affordable housing; to build sustainable infrastructure; to support small business survival; to put people back to work while rebuilding our communities, especially those that are ignored by big banks.
State Treasurer Fiona Ma and Senator Maria Elena Durazo speaking at the State Public Bank hearing.

Public banking proponents gained traction with a series of well-informed presentations from public servants, entrepreneurs, community financial institutions and community groups. California State Treasurer Fiona Ma made it clear that she supports a thorough, appropriate study for the feasibility of a public bank. Henry Levy, Alameda County Treasurer and Tax Collector, noted “a lot of the county treasurers are in support of the goals of a public bank.” Senator Maria Elena Durazo spoke of the critical need for an alternative to Wall Street to address community and small business needs that the current system has failed to support. Durazo emphasized that officials should find ways to move bold ideas forward rather than dismiss them, and acknowledged “The private sector takes advantage of our funds but doesn’t reciprocate the way that it should for our communities.”

Ameya Pawar from Open Society Foundations pointed out that the government gives banks “â€Ķthe license to create money. That is what the public provides private sector banks.” Mr. Pawar offered a solution to Senator Durazo’s concern, saying “There is no reason why the public sector couldn’t also obtain a license to create money, to fill in the gaps that are created by private sector banks.”

Ameya Pawar with Open Society Foundation and Mark Herbert, Vice President of California Small Business Majority testifies in support of a California State Public Bank.

Noni Ramos from Enterprise Community Loan Fund explained how a state public bank would help Community Development Financial Institutions be more effective. “CDFIs work to bring capital to low income and underserved communities and financial resources from the public bank could be leveraged by CDFIs.” Mark Herbert, Vice President of California Small Business Majority concurred, saying public banks provide “â€Ķ the opportunity to think about, how do we get more tools and more resources and more capital to the smallest businesses?” He concluded that “â€Ķfundamentally we need to think about not just this moment — and meeting the significant needs that small business owners and our state face — but how do we build a more equitable economy in the future?”

Scores of community activists made their voices heard in public comment. Trinity Tran from the California Public Banking Alliance made it clear that a public bank will enable public funds for rebuilding and recovery. Ms. Tran reminded legislators at the hearing that while campaigning Governor Newsom committed to breaking the hold of Wall Street banks by establishing a state public bank. Jennifer Tanner, speaking on behalf of Indivisible CA: StateStrong’s over 70 groups with 40,000 members, registered strong support for a state public bank. Ben Hauck of Public Bank Long Beach, called on legislators to take bold action for public banking as a systemic solution to a broken financial system.

Members of UFCW Western States Council.

United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 770’s Political Director Nam Le spoke on behalf of 150,000 grocery and retail frontline workers. The union supports public banks capable of partnering with community banks and credit unions to lend responsibly to localities, especially communities of color, which have suffered the greatest losses in the pandemic. Steve Sittig of Public Bank Pomona Valley pointed out that a state public bank can smooth the way for setting up local and regional public banks.

Joining the overwhelming support for a state bank in the public comment section were California Reinvestment Coalition (CRC), a key ally in California Public Banking Alliance’s effort, representing over 300 California small businesses and CDFIs, and the People’s Alliance for Justice testifying on how a State Public Bank will be able to support CDFIs in their work with the unbanked, leveling the playing field for our most needy.

Richard Girling of United Educators of San Francisco and SF Public Bank Coalition urged legislators to look to Germany’s Sparkassen, a network of hundreds of public banks that have operated for a couple hundred years. Rose Anwich from Ventura County expressed her concern that Wall Street banks continue to finance extractive industries and that public banks are needed for financing climate resilient initiatives. Bonnie Petty, from North Bay Jobs with Justice, noted that had there been a state public bank, recovery funds could have been leveraged to provide much more relief from the fires that destroyed communities.

In a recent newsletter by the Public Banking Act’s co-author Asm. Phil Ting, the Legislative Analyst estimated “a one-time $26 billion windfall in revenues this coming year. However, deficits are projected for several years thereafter. In addition, COVID-19 cases are surging, potentially exacerbating our economic challenges and the number of vulnerable Californians in need of assistance.” Using some of this windfall as the foundation for a state public bank in 2021 will be critical in enabling California to leverage funds in future years to assist in rebuilding and restructuring our local economies.

The California Public Banking Alliance (CPBA) is a coalition of public banking activists in California working to create socially and environmentally responsible city and regional public banks.

Read our article on Medium.

Read More

Public Banking Act Gives Us A Proven Model to Address Unprecedented Crises

By California Public Banking Alliance

America faces a perfect storm of ever-escalating crises which are culminating in a central crisis of democracy itself. We are wholly unprepared for this crisis, because our institutions are failing. From the justice system to the Presidency to Wall Street, Americans are wondering what actually works, and who led us to this situation in the first place. How can we repair the shell-shocked economy and reverse climate change, when politicians and their wealthy donors are steadfast to resist all change that would threaten their bottom lines, even if it ensures the end of life on Earth?

Under their watch, the economic and environmental precarities of working people have mounted for generations, and Black people and immigrants have been shunted to the side of prosperity, health and safety. The COVID-19 pandemic has brought extreme inequality and its deleterious effects on our nation’s social fabric into sharp relief. Renters face mass evictions, small businesses have closed forever, and governments at all levels face huge budget shortfalls that threaten basic services. People who have borne the brunt of inequality for centuries now see their situations getting even worse, and they see police ready to inflict violence to terrorize them into accepting that inequality.

The backdrop of this social turmoil is a global ecosystem incurring irreversible damage threatening homes, global security, and the supply of food and clean water for billions of people, including hundreds of millions in the United States. As fires rage on the West Coast and waters rise in Louisiana and elsewhere, the cost of inaction mounts daily. Meanwhile, millions of Americans are unable to work because the danger of infection is too great or because their jobs no longer exist, while others are forced to work in dangerous situations to maintain basic living standards in the richest country on Earth.

The measures taken to mitigate the impact of these crises on working Americans have failed, but you wouldn’t know it from the mood on Wall Street. Markets continue to forecast rosy days ahead for investors, despite record drops in GDP, employment, and consumer spending. The public health response to the virus has brave and diligent nurses and doctors pleading for resources and coordination from central authorities, who choose instead to pander to markets with promises of a quick reopening. The Federal Reserve has taken extraordinary steps to shore up commercial debt and capital markets, amounting to a massive payday for the richest people in the world. America’s cities, which are blameless in the scope and impact of this catastrophe, face multibillion dollar deficits, school closures, and even bankruptcy, threatening the pay and medical benefits of teachers, firefighters, and sanitation workers. This callousness towards the needs of cities stands in sharp contrast to the swift and active protection received by Wall Street both in 2008, when financial market actors engineered the global collapse, and in 2020, when they show no interest in providing for anyone other than themselves.

The minimal assistance the Fed has extended to the people and their local governments has utterly failed to address this unprecedented economic shock, and has mostly exacerbated the structural inequalities built into our nation’s financial system. The Municipal Liquidity Facility (MLF) was supposed to help state and local governments, but city and state treasurers are in agreement that its terms are onerous and render the effort useless, which is why it has only been tapped twice during the entire pandemic, once with significantly renegotiated terms.

The Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), a forgivable loan program meant to keep people employed and businesses afloat, was mainly eaten up by big, well-connected businesses. The President’s son-in-law was able to borrow millions for his businesses. The National Community Reinvestment Coalition found that lenders discouraged Black borrowers from applying for a loan while encouraging white borrowers to apply for multiple loans. As a result of the historic and long-standing structural barriers to capital for Black and Brown small business owners, only 2% of PPP loans went to Black-owned small businesses and only 6% went to Latinx small businesses. Rather than ensure that workers, small businesses, and school and public health systems are able to withstand this storm, Wall Street and their friends in the Trump administration have made cheap credit available to multi-billion dollar private companies while leaving the rest of us, especially Black people and other marginalized groups, in the rain.

The tools at our disposal today are inadequate to solve our current crises. Efforts to confront the issues head-on, like the ones which make up the Green New Deal, cannot and should not rely on private banks and existing federal programs. Decades of “green” investment, recycling, carbon offsets and luxury electric cars have not slowed the melting of the ice caps or the rising of the seas. Health insurance companies and private hospital chains are not in the business of solving our comorbid healthcare crises of rampant debt, lack of access, and drastically unequal outcomes. Private banks and investors have neither the incentives nor the desire to tackle these issues, nor should we permit them to syphon profit from the massive public investments necessary to effectively deal with them. Instead, Congress and governments at every level must establish new forms of investment for the common good, including public banks, to serve as an alternative to the private financial system, to make these solutions a reality.

The public needs an alternative to Wall Street. As momentum grows in dozens of cities and states across the US to pass public banking legislation, we endorse the Public Banking Act introduced by Representatives Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez. The bill enables the creation of public banks with direct access to the Federal Reserve, creates a pathway for state-chartered banks to gain federal recognition, and recognizes a framework for public banks to interact with Fed Accounts and Digital Dollar platforms. Only the establishment of public investment and banking accountable to the common good will give cities, states and federal agencies the tools we need to solve these crises.

Public banks, defined as banks entirely owned by cities, counties, public districts or states and controlled by the people who live in them, can help ensure credit is made available for local renewable energy and other green businesses, climate-resilient infrastructure, public and affordable housing, education, rehabilitation, and low-cost loans to job-creating entrepreneurs, especially to marginalized communities and worker-owned businesses. Chartering banks to invest public capital in these projects will not completely solve these crises. We need a financial system that prioritizes the livability of our planet and the equality demanded by a free people. We need banks that are answerable to the people, and accountable to standards of sustainable and restorative investment.

Public banks are a proven tool and are essential to a revitalized public financial system. There are over 700 public banks worldwide investing $37.7 trillion, which accounts for 15% of all global assets. Germany’s robust Sparkassen network of over 400 public banks have functioned as the engine of the country’s infrastructure development, providing 72% of all financing for that country’s world-leading renewable energy infrastructure. Wherever they operate, public banks provide a vehicle for economic recovery and resilience by harnessing public credit and financial services to invest directly into local communities, small businesses, and municipal governments.

Public banks complement postal banking and other approaches to democratize the Federal Reserve. Under Tlaib’s bill, public banks in state and cities could seamlessly integrate with FedAccounts, a new proposal that would give Americans easy access to payment services without relying on for profit banks and the risks they pose to deposits. Postal banks could work with public investment banks in counties to reinvest savings accounts into new school construction, paying millions of workers the interest payments instead of a handful of institutional investors. These are not financial innovations, quite the contrary, they are quite common throughout the world, with one special example in the United States.

Domestically, the Bank of North Dakota has operated for over a century and weathered every financial crisis while improving the state’s financial position. In partnership with community banks, BND rolled out the most accessible implementation of PPP and its two successor programs in the country, while deferring all $1.1 billion of its student loans until after the crisis.

We need more publicly-obligated capital sources devoted to economic recovery and reinvention to meet challenges ahead. Public bank efforts in California, New York, Washington, Pennsylvania, and many other states follow the model of existing public banks such as BND and Sparkassen. These banks will facilitate critical investment, largely through partnerships with local community banks and credit unions to provide low-interest loans for small businesses, affordable housing, infrastructure, and other sectors to serve the public good.

Perhaps even more impactful is how public banks will extend access to basic money and financial services for everyday Americans. Private banks have long perpetuated racial and economic inequality by systematically denying basic financial services to Black people and immigrants. In Miami, Detroit, Laredo, TX and the Bronx over 20% of residents do not have bank accounts. In areas of Cleveland, Nashville and Atlanta that number is as high as 40%. Unfettered access to the fruits of one’s own labor is a human right. In 2020, US wages are paid in US dollars which must be deposited into banks, so those of us deemed “unprofitable” have few alternatives. Check cashing services, overdraft fees, and high interest payday loans exact a high cost for being poor, to the benefit privately-owned banks and largely unregulated “shadow banks.” Public banks can offer free and low-cost services universally giving access to check cashing, bank accounts and basic credit services so that everyone can participate in the economy, cash our paychecks, and feed our families.

These are the practical reasons for public banks, but we also have a moral duty to divest from exploitative and extractive systems bound up with private finance. Private financial institutions consider the banking power theirs and theirs alone, and our government has agreed with them, until now. Their opposition to public banking is well documented and rooted in self preservation, not financial prudence. But a banking charter is an instrument of the public trust, and in America governments franchised that power entirely to an unaccountable class of shareholders and lobbyists, to the detriment of working people around the world.

Building an intergenerational foundation for a more just and equitable financial system will proceed faster and more smoothly with a network of publicly owned banks at the municipal and state level. Without this network in place to direct and capture gains from stimulus spending, the recovery could be marked by a decade or more of austerity, with public budgets servicing guaranteed debt to far-flung investors with huge portfolios, but no stake in our communities.

Let’s not repeat the same mistake we made in the last financial crisis. We can transform the foundation of our financial system and place its power in the hands of the people. We can make urgent investments in the recovery, a just economy and a habitable world, and we can create banks and financial infrastructure accountable to those goals. We need public banks now.

Read More

Tlaib, Ocasio-Cortez Introduce Legislation Enabling Creation of Public Banks

Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib (MI-13) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY-14) introduced the historic Public Banking Act, which allows for the creation of state and locally administered public banks by establishing the Public Bank Grant program administered by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board which would provide grants for the formation, chartering and capitalization of public banks. 29 organizations that have long advocated for the public banking system it would make possible also support the legislation, including the California Public Banking Alliance (CBPA).

Read Congresswoman Tlaib’s press release: https://tlaib.house.gov/tlaib-aoc-public-banking-act.

Read More

Public banks are officially law in California! Read our latest press on AB 857!

Read More